Omgfloofy wrote:
You realize we are using text to communicate, don't you? You don't have to yell, I can read what you are saying perfectly clearly.
It seems a little odd to say that you can read when you've ignored that I've asked it three times now. It actually was an honest question to start with.
(I was curious how big he/she could make those letters^^') I can't answer that question anyway, but I am trying to remember how it looked excactly...Anyway - I don't get why the former logo was any problem - I don't see a significant connection between: Trying to use re localized names and having Japanese in the logo as well. I mean the articles also showed the origninal Japanese spelling, so why not the olo as well?
I still haven't got my answer, but maybe no one knows.
Omgfloofy wrote:
It seems a little odd to say that you can read you've ignored that I've asked it three times now. It actually was an honest question to start with.
Yes, I'm very obviously screwing with you.
To be honest, I don't have much of an answer for you. I don't recall who put it up there in the first place, but I do remember thinking it was not accurate. However, I was not in a position to do anything about it with the skills or so on that I had, so it remained as it was. It was never really the most important part of the wiki to focus on anyways.
This comment section lets me freely use HTML and CSS. If I wasn't so lazy and wanting to stick with just header tags, I could have forced a new font size via inline styling.
MethodicMockingbird wrote:
To be honest, I don't have much of an answer for you. I don't recall who put it up there in the first place, but I do remember thinking it was not accurate.
An important thing is identity. I've made all sorts of things for fandoms, and this is the kind of stuff I do at request. There are people out there for it that would happily do this sort of thing for you, too.
Thank you, however, for actually answering.
Omgfloofy wrote:
Thank you, however, for actually answering.
Well, I admit I do take some sort of subconscious pleasure in arguments. It's much simpler, and more gratifying, to sling insults and blame at one another than it is to admit that you don't have all the answers.
Well I do totally know how to change the letters' size, but I was trying to say who big you could make them in the sence of when the size of this comment section is to small xD - so it was actually some kind of (I admit it "bad") joke.
I simply found it -let's say - some kind of funny when the letters grew bigger and bigger (I mean no offence here).
But still, thanks for taking the effort to answer - I mean I did NOT make clear the question wasn't too serious.
I get really frustrated at news sites for banking on that sort of thing, simply because it's actually better for everyone in the long-run to present information completely, which is my philosophy towards how I prefer to work with things on the internet. In cases like Unseelie, there were signs of major depression in all of the posts in this thread, but it takes a blantant 'I fucking hate my life' statement to really make it stand out.
I love arguing and shitposting as much as the next person, but I think information dissemination is incredibly important on the internet- which is also why I'm a stickler for accuracy.
Best example! Did you know: Wikipedia actually had the summary of Trails of Cold Steel incorrect for almost two years thanks to SiliconEra translating it incorrectly, and continuously doubling-down on their mistranslation, even after XSEED unveiled the localization and general plot of the game? Attempts to edit it out were reverted because SiliconEra is a 'trusted source,' too. As a result, there is a subset of gamers who aren't familiar with the Trails series that think Trails of Cold Steel is a prequel to Trails in the Sky, simply because of SiliconEra's continuous misreports and Wikipedia's parroting of said misreports.
Accuracy of information is important.
and this got far more rambly than I expected. sorry about that.
Omgfloofy wrote:
I get really frustrated at news sites for banking on that sort of thing, simply because it's actually better for everyone in the long-run to present information completely, which is my philosophy towards how I prefer to work with things on the internet. In cases like Unseelie, there were signs of major depression in all of the posts in this thread, but it takes a blantant 'I fucking hate my life' statement to really make it stand out.
I love arguing and shitposting as much as the next person, but I think information dissemination is incredibly important on the internet- which is also why I'm a stickler for accuracy.
Best example! Did you know: Wikipedia actually had the summary of Trails of Cold Steel incorrect for almost two years thanks to SiliconEra translating it incorrectly, and continuously doubling-down on their mistranslation, even after XSEED unveiled the localization and general plot of the game? Attempts to edit it out were reverted because SiliconEra is a 'trusted source,' too. As a result, there is a subset of gamers who aren't familiar with the Trails series that think Trails of Cold Steel is a prequel to Trails in the Sky, simply because of SiliconEra's continuous misreports and Wikipedia's parroting of said misreports.
Accuracy of information is important.
and this got far more rambly than I expected. sorry about that.
Yes, well, all of that said, you can't expect everything to always line up. Sometimes things are too large and they get bogged down under their own weight and cannot cope with maintaining everything at once. Something has to give eventually.